Private Jet to Vegas – Ultimate Luxury – Challenger 300
Contact us to Add Your Business
Quick flight from Van Nuys (Los Angeles regional airport) to Las Vegas on a Bombardier Challenger 300 private jet. You can really feel the performance of the small plane, like riding in a sports car compared to the lumbering buses of public aviation. Quiet, smooth, fast, and the ultimate in convenience. How will I ever fly commercial again? Watch to the end to hear the pilot chide a UAL pilot for taxiing too slowly.
Apologies for the shaky video – I was using a brand new Sony RX100iv camera and wasn't aware that in 4k mode it would give me such terrible rolling shutter. Lesson learned. Guess I'll have to book another private jet flight to take a better video!
Yah I was wondering about these? How was the turbulence in a private plane? I figured it would be more since it’s a smaller plane… And it looks like the landings are rough too… Maybe the real luxury is having your own Boeing modify like an 850 sq Ft apparent and u would feel the turbulence less…
@Jonathan Stewart Do you prefer the gulfstream or challenge
Nope all the same. Her camera was on zoom causing the shakiness
OMG this commend made me cringe so much. These are the dumbest questions and the hard landing has nothing to do with the plane…. And turbulence has nothing to do with the plane. There’s really minimal turbulence difference. unless you’re in a really small plane like light jetPiper or Cessna.
otbway o yes the custom interior design is due for those a o my
otbway .
Dude you got to get in control of the camera you’re shaking it way too much ?
your video is so jumpy makes one sick watching it
@LOYC JOE hahahahaha so right 😉 the same I thought – an absolutely nogo! 🙂
@LOYC JOE it was a charter that’s why they know nothing about planes and he says dumbest information that is fake. He’s a fucking know it all but he doesn’t know anything.
He explains why its jumping and maybe it wasn’t on his dime. Gotta love YouTube comments. Smh
can afford a privet jet but not a state of the art camera makes the entire point of this video pointless lol but still good content 🙂
Obnoxious
Jonathan, maybe a camera pistol grip would help your video, they’re under $30 online, it’s a quick fix to the stabilisation issue 🙂 Nice video though.
@Dan The Doge Yep, the 4k on the rx100iv is awful, the 1080 not as bad. Now that I know it’s there, I can manage it somewhat, but this was its maiden voyage.
@Jonathan Stewart Honestly as an enthusiast photographer myself, video is 100 times harder to do well. There might be a different amount of rolling shutter between recording in 1080p and 4k, not sure about the rx100 but some have less on one or the other.
+Dan The Doge Thanks. I’ll get crap until the end of time for this lousy image quality. It’s embarrassing, since I’m a professional photographer, but I was using a brand new camera and didn’t think it would give me such terrible rolling shutter.
Nice!! I’m going finding one day go on a private jet
8:48 ‘Looks like some life raft or life vest or something;
er, good safety briefing then?……….
I know that first officer!
buy a DJI Osmo, a gimbal for your camera 🙂 makes everything steady
The lady I’m going to throw up ?
Great video. Thanks for sharing
Could imagine if they landed at JFK and Kennedy Steve was on “United 4523, taxi faster, the rich people behind you want to deplane”
“… the 1% behind you are in a hurry…”
+shades921 Gotta love Steve
Fuel cost money- sitting there with engines running cost money- the UAL pilot is probably lost and doesn’t know where he/she is going.
And any pilot who is sitting behind another plane that is idling on the taxiway is going to WTF the plane in front.
✈️Nice Video. Thank you for sharing✈️
Awesome video! Always wanted to fly private but until then this is good enough for me 🙂 keep up the videos!
Good video. Thanks for sharing ?
Great Video, wasn’t too shaky at all!
KVNY-KLAS is only a short flight, 275-325 statute miles takeoff to landing depending on routing. You only climb to 21-27 thousand feet, so you were still down in the weather. By climbing higher you’d just have to spend a long time coming down again and losing the energy. If you climbed to the service ceiling of 45,000 feet, which you could easily do with light load for a short trip, you’d need nearly half the distance to get down again. So you’d expend a lot of fuel for nothing, because you don’t have the cruise phase at high efficiency to make up for the fuel burned climbing. At high altitude you burn half the fuel per mile (very very very roughly). If you flew to Chicago or Miami from Van Nuys you’d climb to over 40,000 feet and have a smooth ride.
Looks like it was alot of fun. Thanks for sharing.
Nice one! Thanks for sharing.
This is the first aviation video I’ve watched where the turbulence began before the flight even took off.
Worst ever!
Totally agree, poor camera work!
hahahah I agree……I got the shakes……my head is bubbling like crazy…..had to move on
For future reference it’s FBO not SBO. Fixed Base Operator.
+Zach C Yeah, no offense Jon….
+Zach C Thanks.